I consider myself to be a peacemaker. Not because I'm a saint, just because conflict makes me uncomfortable, and I'd rather we all just be friends. As such, I am rather adept at seeing both sides of any given argument; even when an issue seems to be completely black and white, I can sometimes just sense that there's another side, I just haven't found it yet.
For example, Kony 2012. Surely there could only be one stance on this one, right? What sane person could argue against bringing such a deplorable human being to justice? However, you'll notice that I did not repost any emotional videos rallying support for that cause. I just felt like...something was off. Maybe I just didn't think that posting that video would change anything. Maybe I prefer to be blissfully ignorant of vast miseries that I cannot cure. Or maybe I just have a sixth sense for different but valid points of view. Anyway, yesterday Christian showed me this, which states rather convincingly the other side of the argument. I thought it was interesting and informative. http://thedailywh.at/2012/03/07/on-kony-2012-2/
I understand that the 'damn' video has its faults. I understand that the BBB criticizes the IC for failing to provide information enabling it to be a credible charitable organization. But the arguments posted on the Daily What site have errors as well. For example: "Myopically placing the blame for all of central Africa’s woes on Kony — even as a starting point — will only imperil many more people than are already in danger." The film never places all of central Africa's woes on Kony. The film has spread awareness. It has brought together people who are trying to do something to stop the atrocities being committed against the children. While it is true these are not the only atrocities being committed in the world today, just because there are so many atrocities surely doesn't mean we have to spend years arguing about which ones to stop first. We must try to do something. I would rather try and fail, than never try. I sleep better that way.
ReplyDeleteBut see, that's exactly what I'm saying. Both sides have compelling arguments. It's not like we have one side saying that Kony is the devil and another side saying that child slavery isn't a bad thing at all. And it's not like we have one presidential candidate that loves America and wants to protect us and our country and another candidate who can't wait to sell us out. I believe both parties would, if elected, work according to their conscience for the betterment of America, that each just has different ideas of how to do that. And I, with my limited understanding of economics or politics or diplomacy, have trouble second guessing men who have made those things their careers.
ReplyDelete